Jamie Kloncz, founder of SEO Elite Agency.
Most agency founder pages are a list of adjectives. This one is a list of things you can check. Every claim on this site names a source you can open, every page can be verified against a published hash, and the numbers we are not able to prove are not on the site at all. That is the whole pitch, and it is testable.
★ 5.0 ON GOOGLE · NAPLES, FL · NO LONG-TERM CONTRACTS

Jamie Kloncz is the founder of SEO Elite Agency, an SEO, GEO and AEO agency in Naples, Florida. The agency works month-to-month with no long-term contracts, opens every engagement with a free visibility audit, and publishes the evidence behind its claims so a prospective client can check them independently.
Who runs SEO Elite Agency?
Jamie Kloncz, the founder, out of Naples, Florida. It is a focused, founder-led firm rather than a large agency with an account-management layer, which means the person who audits your site is the person you talk to. That is a real trade-off, and it is stated plainly on the pages where it matters.
The agency operates from 1950 Mayfair Street, Suite 313 in Naples, Florida, and serves clients across Southwest Florida, statewide, and nationally. Where we are not local to a market, we say so on that market's page rather than implying a presence we do not have. Our Tampa, Miami and Jacksonville pages all open by stating that we are a Naples team, because a fabricated local address would not rank a business anyway.
Founder-led is a constraint as much as a selling point. There is no bench of forty people, and our enterprise SEO page says so directly: if you need a global program staffed across twenty markets, that is not us, and pretending otherwise would waste your money. Where a focused firm outperforms is senior attention on the work, and being told honestly when the answer is no.
The practical version: you get an audit before you get a quote, you are told what we will not do, and you can leave at the end of any month. An agency that needs a twelve-month contract to keep a client is telling you something about its confidence in the work.
How do you know anything on this site is true?
Because you can check it. Every statistic names its source inline and links to the body that published it. Every page carries a content hash you can verify. And the site's own build refuses to publish an unbacked claim, which is a constraint on us, not a promise to you.
Start with the citations. Where a page says a number, it names who measured it and when, and the source list links to the original study rather than a blog post summarizing it. When a claim could not be traced to the body that actually measured it, it was cut instead of softened. That is not a style preference: an SEO agency that cannot source its own claims has no business auditing yours.
Then check the hashes. Every page on this site is hashed at build time and published to a transparency record, so you can confirm the text you are reading is the text we published and that an article has not been quietly edited after the fact. Most sites cannot offer that. It exists here because the argument the agency makes is about verifiability, and an argument you refuse to apply to yourself is just marketing.
The last layer is the one nobody sees. The build itself runs gates that block a statistic without a citation, block a dead source URL, and block a set of numbers we have specifically banned ourselves from using. If a claim cannot clear those, the site does not build. We would rather ship a smaller claim than a louder one we cannot defend.
What claims does this agency refuse to make?
Guaranteed rankings, invented track-record statistics, fake local addresses, and any number we cannot trace to a source. Several of those are blocked at the build level, which means the refusal survives whoever writes the next page, including a future version of us in a hurry.
Nobody controls Google, so we never promise guaranteed rankings, and an agency that does is either chasing phrases nobody searches or doing something you will pay for later. What we commit to is a prioritized program, honest attribution, and the discipline to report numbers that survive scrutiny rather than numbers that flatter the channel.
No invented track record. Agency-performance statistics of the "hundreds of businesses ranked, ninety-eight percent retention" variety are unverifiable by definition, and this site bans them outright at the build level. If we ever want to make a claim like that, it will need to be provable first. Until then it stays off the site, and the build enforces that rather than trusting anyone to remember.
No borrowed authority. Certifications, media features and partner badges belong on a page only when there is evidence behind them, and the same rule applies to us as to a client we would tell to remove an unearned trust badge. It is the least persuasive kind of copy anyway: a reader who can check one claim and find it hollow discounts every other claim on the page.
What does the agency actually do?
Four systems that only work together: technical SEO so engines can read your site, local SEO for the map pack, content written to be quoted, and GEO so AI engines can name your business. Sold separately they underperform, because Google and the AI engines read a business as one entity, not four invoices.
The technical layer is the floor. Server-rendered HTML a crawler can read, an architecture engines can follow, correct schema, and speed that holds up on an ordinary phone. This matters more every year because AI crawlers do not execute JavaScript, so anything that appears only after a script runs is invisible to the engines your buyers now ask (Vercel, 2024). Our technical SEO page covers that work in full.
The local layer is where the phone rings, and the mechanics are specific: an accurate Google Business Profile with the right primary category, consistent citations, and a real review cadence. Google's own guidance for a Business Profile is blunt about the foundation, saying a business name should be "used consistently on your storefront, website, stationery, and as known to customers" (Google). Our local SEO page covers the rest.
The content and GEO layers close the loop. Pages that answer a real question in the first sixty words feed both search snippets and AI citations out of the same work, and clean entity signals let a model name your business with confidence instead of reaching for a national brand. The compounding is the point: one body of work serving the map pack, organic search, and the answer engines at once.
How do you work with clients?
Audit first, quote second, month-to-month always. Most engagements run between $1,200 and $3,500 a month, with competitive verticals and multi-location work starting higher. We quote after seeing the site, never before, because a flat price offered before an audit is a guess with a number on it.
The audit comes first and it is free. It shows current rankings, technical health and Core Web Vitals, Google Business Profile performance, a competitor gap analysis against whoever is actually beating you, a backlink review, and your visibility across AI engines. You leave with a prioritized list ranked by likely impact, whether or not you hire us. Our pricing page sets out how a quote gets scoped.
For market context rather than as our own rate: the most common monthly band across US, UK and Australian providers is $2,501 to $5,000, charged by 34% of them (Backlinko, 2026), while 68.8% of agencies charge $2,000 or less per month (Ahrefs, 2024). That spread is the gap between a small single-location job and a competitive metro campaign, which is exactly why a package label set before anyone looks at your site tells you nothing.
Reporting is in outcomes, not screenshots: organic-attributed calls, form fills and revenue tracked in your CRM or call system, alongside keyword movement, map-pack position and AI citation checks. A number-one ranking on a term nobody converts on is a vanity metric, and we will say so rather than put it on a slide.
Why does an SEO founder publish his own mistakes?
Because the alternative is asking you to trust a page that has never been checked. This site documents the claims it cut and why, including several that were flattering and wrong. A record of corrections is stronger evidence of judgment than a page with no visible seams.
Verification is not a posture, it is a habit that costs something. Building this site meant cutting claims that would have sold better: rankings that turned out to have no independent body measuring them, statistics whose headline number described a different population than the sentence implied, and figures that were true when written and quietly went stale. Each one was removed rather than reworded.
The same discipline is what a client is actually buying. An agency that will not check its own numbers will not check yours either, and in a field where the failure mode is a confident number nobody traced, that is the difference between content that earns citations and content that gets quietly discounted. The habit is the product.
So this page ends where it started: nothing here asks for trust it has not shown you how to test. Open a source. Check a hash. Ask us where a number came from and when it was last verified. If any of it does not hold up, that is worth knowing before you hire anyone, including us. Reach us at (843) 955-7727 or hello@seoeliteagency.com.
LAST UPDATED 2026-07-15 · WRITTEN BY JAMIE KLONCZ, FOUNDER · SEO ELITE AGENCY, NAPLES FL